<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Acer low-cost PC expected to be cheaper than second-generation Eee PC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eeepcworld.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/acer-low-cost-pc-expected-to-be-cheaper-than-second-generation-eee-pc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eeepcworld.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/acer-low-cost-pc-expected-to-be-cheaper-than-second-generation-eee-pc/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 16:20:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Walt</title>
		<link>http://eeepcworld.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/acer-low-cost-pc-expected-to-be-cheaper-than-second-generation-eee-pc/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 03:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eeepcworld.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/acer-low-cost-pc-expected-to-be-cheaper-than-second-generation-eee-pc/#comment-491</guid>
		<description>FOB means freight on board, not free on board. FOB price is the price one pay for the product including shipping from the factory to the departure port and ocean transfer to the destination port.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOB means freight on board, not free on board. FOB price is the price one pay for the product including shipping from the factory to the departure port and ocean transfer to the destination port.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Even more competition for the Eee Pc! MSI Wind, Acer, ECS &#124; 406 Not Acceptable</title>
		<link>http://eeepcworld.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/acer-low-cost-pc-expected-to-be-cheaper-than-second-generation-eee-pc/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Even more competition for the Eee Pc! MSI Wind, Acer, ECS &#124; 406 Not Acceptable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 01:19:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eeepcworld.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/acer-low-cost-pc-expected-to-be-cheaper-than-second-generation-eee-pc/#comment-453</guid>
		<description>[...] three companies are looking to amend the main issue with the ASUS Eee Pc &#8212; the screensize. Acer are looking to match the Eee Pc 900&#8217;s 8.9 inch screen; MSI are considering an 8 or 10 inch screen; whilst ECS plan on having a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] three companies are looking to amend the main issue with the ASUS Eee Pc &#8212; the screensize. Acer are looking to match the Eee Pc 900&#8217;s 8.9 inch screen; MSI are considering an 8 or 10 inch screen; whilst ECS plan on having a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
